|
New York Public Library
Milton
Plate 30 |
Only once in his illuminated books
did Blake use the word simplicity. In mirror writing as an
epigraph for the Second Book of Milton he wrote these
words:
"How wide the Gulf & Unpassable!
between Simplicity & Insipidity
Contraries are Positives A Negation is not a Contrary"
The gulf between simplicity and
insipidity is not that of contraries which in Beulah may be
equally true. Insipidity is a negation of simplicity. Blake's
intends his poetry to be clear and unadorned, not encumbered by
superfluous ornamentation. Neither does he choose to direct his
poetry to those who concentrate their attention on triviality
and frivolity. Simple truth and simple beauty are expressions of
inner verities to which he gave his attention.
If complexity is the contrary of
simplicity, the two are not mutually exclusive. Discovering the
order of a complex pattern elucidates the simplicity which
underlies it. What appears to be simple on the surface may
depend on intricate, complex execution to produce the final
product. But if either the complex or the simple is
misunderstood as being reducible to the superficial it becomes
insipid, providing false reasoning about its true nature. Often
Blake's simplicity hides deep hidden meaning; and his complexity
becomes simple truth when it is understood.
In his drawings, paintings and
engravings Blake aimed to achieve clarity and simplicity by
making his lines firm and definite. The bounding line separated
the definite from amorphous undefined exterior. Blots and blurs
confused the distinction between truth and falsehood. The
certainty which was Blake's aim came from the knowledge of the
Presence guiding the hand and eye that shapes the fearful
symmetry.
Milton, Plate 30, (E 129)
[mirror writing)
"How wide the Gulf &
Unpassable! between Simplicity & Insipidity
Contraries are Positives
A Negation is not a Contrary"
Descriptive Catalogue, Page 21, (E 536)
"The Plowman is simplicity itself, with wisdom and strength
for its stamina. Chaucer has divided the ancient character of
Hercules between his Miller and his Plowman. Benevolence is the
plowman's great characteristic, he is thin with excessive labour,
and not with old age, as some have supposed."
Letters, To Flaxman, (E 710)
"Dear Sculptor of Eternity
We are safe arrived at our Cottage which is more beautiful
than I thought it. & more convenient. It is a perfect Model for
Cottages & I think for Palaces of Magnificence only Enlarging not
altering its proportions & adding ornaments & not principals.
Nothing can be more Grand than its Simplicity & Usefulness.
Simple without Intricacy it seems to be the Spontaneous Effusion
of Humanity congenial to the wants of Man. No other formed House
can ever please me so well nor shall I ever be perswaded I
believe that it can be improved either in Beauty or Use"
Letters, To Butts, (E 733)
"Dear Sir This perhaps was sufferd to Clear up some doubts &
to give opportunity to those whom I doubted to clear themselves
of all imputation. If a Man offends me ignorantly & not
designedly surely I ought to consider him with favour &
affection. Perhaps the simplicity of myself is the origin of all
offences committed against me. If I have found this I shall have
learned a most valuable thing well worth three years
perseverance. I have found it! It is certain! that a too
passive manner. inconsistent with my active physiognomy had done
me much mischief I must now express to you my conviction that all
is come from the spiritual World for Good & not for Evil."
Letters, To Trusler, (E 702)
"But
you ought to know that What is Grand is necessarily obscure to
Weak men. That which can be made Explicit to the Idiot is not
worth my care. The wisest of the Ancients considerd what is not
too Explicit as the fittest for Instruction because it rouzes the
faculties to act. I name Moses Solomon Esop Homer Plato"
Letters, To Cumberland, (E 703)
"I ought long ago to have written to you to thank you for
your kind recommendation to Dr Trusler which tho it has faild of
success is not the less to be rememberd by me with Gratitude--
I have made him a Drawing in my best manner he has sent it
back with a Letter full of Criticisms in which he says it accords
not with his Intentions which are to Reject all Fancy from his
Work. How far he Expects to please I cannot tell. But as I
cannot paint Dirty rags & old Shoes where I ought to place Naked
Beauty or simple ornament. I despair of Ever pleasing one Class
of Men--Unfortunately our authors of books are among this Class
how soon we Shall have a change for the better I cannot Prophecy."
Jerusalem, Plate 55, (E 205)
"They Plow'd in tears, the trumpets sounded before the golden Plow
And the voices of the Living Creatures were heard in the clouds of heaven
Crying: Compell the Reasoner to Demonstrate with unhewn Demonstrations
Let the Indefinite be explored. and let every Man be judged
By his own Works, Let all Indefinites be thrown into Demonstrations
To be pounded to dust & melted in the Furnaces of Affliction:
He who would do good to another, must do it in Minute Particulars
General Good is the plea of the scoundrel hypocrite & flatterer:
For Art & Science cannot exist but in minutely organized Particulars
And not in generalizing Demonstrations of the Rational Power.
The Infinite alone resides in Definite & Determinate Identity
Establishment of Truth depends on destruction of Falshood continually
On Circumcision: not on Virginity, O Reasoners of Albion
So cried they at the Plow. Albions Rock frowned above
And the Great Voice of Eternity rolled above terrible in clouds
Saying Who will go forth for us! & Who shall we send before our face?"
Jerusalem, Plate 80, (E 237)
"And Rahab like a dismal and indefinite hovering Cloud
Refusd to take a definite form. she hoverd over all the Earth
Calling the definite, sin: defacing every definite form;
Invisible, or Visible, stretch'd out in length or spread in breadth:
Over the Temples drinking groans of victims weeping in pity,
And joying in the pity, howling over Jerusalems walls."
Public Address, (E 576)
"I have heard many People say Give me the Ideas. It is no
matter what Words you put them into & others say Give me the
Design it is no matter for the Execution. These People know
Nothing Of Art. Ideas cannot be Given
but in their minutely Appropriate Words nor Can a Design be made
without its minutely Appropriate Execution. The unorganized
Blots & Blurs of Rubens & Titian are not Art nor can their Method
ever express Ideas or Imaginations any more than Popes
Metaphysical jargon of Rhyming. Unappropriate Execution is the
Most nauseous affectation & foppery He who copies does
not Execute he only Imitates what is already Executed Execution
is only the result of Invention"
Annotations to Reynolds, (E 646)
"The Man who asserts that there is no Such Thing as Softness
in Art & that every thing in Art is Definite & Determinate has
not been told this by Practise but by Inspiration & Vision
because Vision is Determinate & Perfect & he Copies That without
Fatigue Every thing being Definite & determinate Softness is
Produced Alone by Comparative Strength & Weakness in the Marking
out of the Forms
I say These Principles could never be found out by the Study
of Nature without Con or Innate Science"
Descriptive Catalogue, (E 550)
"The great and golden rule of art, as well as of life, is
this: That the more distinct, sharp, and wirey the
bounding line, the more perfect the work of art; and the less
keen and sharp, the greater is the evidence of weak imitation,
plagiarism, and bungling. Great inventors, in all ages, knew
this: Protogenes and Apelles knew each other by this line.
Rafael and Michael Angelo, and Albert Durer, are known by this
and this alone. The want of this determinate and bounding form
evidences the want of idea in the artist's mind, and the t
pretence of the plagiary in all its branches. How do we
distinguish the oak from the beech, the horse from the ox, but
by the bounding outline? How do we distinguish one face or
countenance from another, but by the bounding line and its
infinite inflexions and movements? What is it that builds a house
and plants a garden, but the definite and determinate? What is it
that distinguishes honesty from knavery, but the hard and wirey
line of rectitude and certainty in the actions and
intentions. Leave out this line and you leave out life itself;
all is chaos again, and the line of the almighty must be drawn
out upon it before man or beast can exist. Talk no more then of
Correggio, or Rembrandt, or any other of those plagiaries of
Venice or Flanders. They were but the lame imitators of lines
drawn by their predecessors, and their works prove themselves
contemptible dis-arranged imitations and blundering misapplied
copies."
.