Tuesday, November 20, 2012

Church 2


       The Church Fathers congregated in Rome, but Gnosticism had its center
in Alexandria, a marketplace of competing religious and philosophical ideas.
There in the third century a man named Plotinus gave birth to
 Neo-platonism, an amalgam of the best of Greek thought with the ethical
teachings of Christ.

Extremely eclectic, drawing on currents of thought from Rome to India,
Plotinus's teachings became the religion of some of the later Roman Emperors.

       During the fourth century the religion of Neo-platonism disappeared as a
rival of the Church. However it deeply influenced the shape of Christian
theology, most notably through the mind of St. Augustine. Augustine in his
spiritual journey passed through a Neo-platonic stage, which left its mark upon
his Christian life and writing. Augustine occupies an anomalous position in the
history of the Church: he is both a Church Father of impeccable reputation and
the spiritual forebear of many theologians whose Neo-platonic bent put them on
the fringe of orthodoxy:

       Erigena, Duns Scotus, William of Ockham, Meister Eckhart are a few of
these Neo-platonic Christians. Some of these thinkers succeeded in remaining
within the umbrella of the authorized tradition; some were partially or totally
cast out. Among them they preserved to theology a breadth and a poetic
dimension that burst open the priestly cocoon with the 15th Century
Renaissance and the 16th Century Reformation.

                          The Middle Ages

       Through the Middle Ages the successors of the Church Fathers, most
notably the authorities at Rome, maintained a fairly firm grip on the shape of
theological and intellectual activity. They presided over an age of stability with a
gradual leavening of creative change. They aborted many changes in the name
of orthodoxy; the aborted change usually went underground to reappear at a
more open time and place. The openness most often proved momentary. Creative
truth struggled against rigid institutional necessities.

       In spite of all the Church periodically gave birth to men and women who,
from the platform of the orthodox tradition, were elevated to a direct vision of
God. Most of the creative change in the Church originated with such types. The
 Church rather uniformly discouraged mystical visions of God unless they
conformed in full detail to the orthodoxy of the moment. God refused such
limitations; the entire period witnessed recurring visions of great diversity. Many
of these prophetically judged the priestly position. A long volume could be
written about the many prophetic visions which in one way or another resemble
that of our poet.

       The Church was broad enough to include and even honor many of these free spirits,
but the works which followed them in the hands of their more militant
disciples generally fell into ill repute. The early Franciscan movement is a case
in point. St. Francis preached to his little sisters the birds; he shared the
stigmata of Christ and suggested that to share Christ's poverty might be fitting
for his disciples, an extremely radical idea which an extremely wealthy pope
indulged. But many of Francis' disciples faced persecution of various sorts.

       Roughly contemporary with Francis another monk named Joachim of Flora
rediscovered for the nth time the dominance of the Spirit over the letter.
Preaching what he called the Everlasting Gospel Joachim proposed to dispense
with the corrupt and worldly political structures of the establishment and move
into a New Age, the era of the Holy Spirit. The New Age would replace the age
of the Church; it would be an age of freedom with everyone led directly by the
Spirit. Jeremiah had foretold this. Even Moses had said, "would to God that all
the Lord's people were prophets". For the creative poet the New Age
represented freedom at its best, exactly what Jesus had come to bring us. For
most of the priests it represented antinomianism at its worst.

       The Everlasting Gospel and the New Age came down the centuries through
the various subterranean channels of the heterodox tradition. Swedenborg
announced its advent in 1757, which happened to be the year of Blake's birth;
Blake noted this with obvious delight in 'The Marriage of Heaven and Hell'.
Years later, in the autumn of his life, Blake filled his spiritual journal with a
fragmentary poem called 'The Everlasting Gospel'. It was his systematic attempt
to set forth in the most direct terms possible his precise view of Christianity and
its founder. He probably never concluded the project to his full satisfaction.


                              The Reformation

       To many of us the Protestant Reformation represents a breaking free from
the oppression of ecclesiastical tyranny. Unfortunately the tyrannies of Luther
and Calvin soon replaced those of the Pope, and the conflicts among the various
orthodoxies brought about in the 16th and 17th Centuries perhaps the most
satanic bloodletting the church has ever experienced.

       The Protestant authorities in general were no less rigid theologically than
the Romans from whom they had separated. When a German cobbler named
Jacob Boehme started talking directly to God, his pastor had him exiled.
However the Lord got Boehme's ear and proceeded to talk to him about
Oneness, about the emanations coming from the One, the dark side and the light
side. The Lord graced Boehme with a fantastically vivid and voluminous
imagination; his visions resembled in many ways those of the Christian Gnostics
and of Plotinus. They also owed much to the alchemical doctor, Paracelsus.

       Boehme went a long way beyond the orthodoxy of either Catholic or
Protestant authorities, but a sweetness of spirit pervaded his mind reminiscent
of St. Francis and of other simple souls who have walked with God. Cast out by
his church, Boehme still won the respect and support of many serious thinkers,
products of the liberating currents of Renaissance and Reformation. His friends
published his work widely, and it endured the test of time. Almost two hundred
years later, in the late 18th Century, it appeared in an English translation
attributed to William Law.

       This work became one of Blake's primary sources. He seized on Boehme's
visions with delight; he recognized in Boehme a creative servant of God who
held the imagination as highly as he did himself. Speaking of a series of
anthropomorphic metaphysical designs which appeared in Law's Boehme he told
Crabb Robinson that "Michaelangelo could not have done better". Much of the
Neo-platonic flavor of Blake's work came down to him through Boehme, his
most immediate fountain for the heterodox tradition.

       For a great many peasants in Germany the Reformation meant little more
than a change of masters; nothing really happened. They had been accustomed
to doing what they were told by the Pope's priests; now they did what they were
told by Luther's priests. Likewise Geneva afforded no real relief from the
pervasive spiritual repression, what Blake referred to as the "mind forg'd
manacles". Soon after he won power, Calvin had a child beheaded for striking
his father; he executed a man named Servetus for denying the Trinity. He and his
contemporaries inaugurated a new round of bloodthirstiness decimating the
population of Europe, all in the name of Christ! Blake observed all this without
the usual conventional blindness and concluded that the Reformation arose
through envy of power--a plague on both houses!

       But some of the devout did go further than their masters. Some peasants
 decided that a believer should be baptized after the age of consent; he should
even elect his own priest. The Holy Spirit swept across Europe with the Radical 
Reformation. Free churches arose here and there and were stamped out with
great vigor by Catholics and (right wing) Protestants alike. The Romans had
never shown such brutality. It was a century to to be thankful you were not born

       In their efforts to escape extermination the free churchmen wandered
across the face of Europe. They found refuge in a few islands of political sanity
amidst the general theological madness: Switzerland, Bohemia, Holland.
Another of these islands was England. The non-Conformist tradition in England
swelled to a climax in the 17th Century. The Puritans came to power about 1642
and six years later went so far as to behead a king.

       During the Civil War the anabaptists and radicals-- Levellers, Diggers,
Ranters, Quakers, Muggletonians, Fifth Monarchists, etc. etc.--came within an
inch of taking over England. For a few years censorship collapsed, and free
thought had open season. Every conceivable idea about God and man had its
day. The Levellers even questioned the idea of private property. Their religious
and social theories were so radical that Cromwell and his confederates found it
necessary, for the protection of their middle class values, to return the Crown to
the son of the man whom they had beheaded. John Milton had warned them that
they would do this unless they learned to control their greed.

       The anabaptists and Milton both exercised an overwhelming influence on
the mind of William Blake; call them his spiritual grandparents. Milton shared
much of the radical theology of the left wing. Even before the Civil War he had
expressed his strong anti-priestly bent: "The hungry sheep look up and are not
fed". Milton believed that the Church had become hopelessly corrupted by


       We can summarize this "Blakean vision of Christianity" with the conclusion
that Blake thought of the institutional church as one of the powers of the world,
under the dominion of the God of this World. He described it with the colorful
though not original phrase, "the Synagogue of Satan". Bear in mind that in
Blake's eternal vision differences of time and space had little meaning; he made
no distinction between the Sadduccees of the Sanhedrin who had condemned
Jesus and the Anglican bishops of his own day, one of whom condemned his
friend, Tom Paine.

No comments: