This post was first published in August 2013 in celebration of the 50th Anniversary of the March on Washington. It is republished today in honor of Martin Luther King's 86TH birthday.
There follows a quote from Martin Luther King's letter written from the
jail in Birmingham, Alabama in April of 1963. King had been
jailed for refusing to discontinue his protests against the abuse of
justice in the segregated South. He took the opportunity of his
imprisonment to make a statement of the foundations of the movement to
non-violently enact 'extreme' measures to replace the passive acceptance
of conditions which were an outrage to the conscience of just men.
"I
am cognizant of the interrelatedness of all communities
and states. I
cannot sit idly
by in Atlanta and not be concerned about what happens in Birmingham.
Injustice anywhere is
a threat
to justice everywhere. We are caught in an inescapable network
of mutuality, tied in a
single garment
of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly.
Never again can we
afford to live with
the narrow, provincial "outside agitator" idea. Anyone who lives
inside the United States
can never be
considered an outsider anywhere within its bounds.
...
Oppressed people cannot remain oppressed forever. The yearning for freedom eventually manifests itself, and that is what has happened to the American Negro. Something within has reminded him of his birthright of freedom, and something without has reminded him that it can be gained. Consciously or unconsciously, he has been caught up by the Zeitgeist, and with his black brothers of Africa and his brown and yellow brothers of Asia, South America and the Caribbean, the United States Negro is moving with a sense of great urgency toward the promised land of racial justice. If one recognizes this vital urge that has engulfed the Negro community, one should readily understand why public demonstrations are taking place. The Negro has many pent up resentments and latent frustrations, and he must release them. So let him march; let him make prayer pilgrimages to the city hall; let him go on freedom rides -and try to understand why he must do so. If his repressed emotions are not released in nonviolent ways, they will seek expression through violence; this is not a threat but a fact of history. So I have not said to my people: "Get rid of your discontent." Rather, I have tried to say that this normal and healthy discontent can be channeled into the creative outlet of nonviolent direct action. And now this approach is being termed extremist. But though I was initially disappointed at being categorized as an extremist, as I continued to think about the matter I gradually gained a measure of satisfaction from the label. Was not Jesus an extremist for love: "Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you." Was not Amos an extremist for justice: "Let justice roll down like waters and righteousness like an ever flowing stream." Was not Paul an extremist for the Christian gospel: "I bear in my body the marks of the Lord Jesus." Was not Martin Luther an extremist: "Here I stand; I cannot do otherwise, so help me God." And John Bunyan: "I will stay in jail to the end of my days before I make a butchery of my conscience." And Abraham Lincoln: "This nation cannot survive half slave and half free." And Thomas Jefferson: "We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal . . ." So the question is not whether we will be extremists, but what kind of extremists we will be. Will we be extremists for hate or for love? Will we be extremists for the preservation of injustice or for the extension of justice? In that dramatic scene on Calvary's hill three men were crucified. We must never forget that all three were crucified for the same crime--the crime of extremism. Two were extremists for immorality, and thus fell below their environment. The other, Jesus Christ, was an extremist for love, truth and goodness, and thereby rose above his environment. Perhaps the South, the nation and the world are in dire need of creative extremists."
...
Oppressed people cannot remain oppressed forever. The yearning for freedom eventually manifests itself, and that is what has happened to the American Negro. Something within has reminded him of his birthright of freedom, and something without has reminded him that it can be gained. Consciously or unconsciously, he has been caught up by the Zeitgeist, and with his black brothers of Africa and his brown and yellow brothers of Asia, South America and the Caribbean, the United States Negro is moving with a sense of great urgency toward the promised land of racial justice. If one recognizes this vital urge that has engulfed the Negro community, one should readily understand why public demonstrations are taking place. The Negro has many pent up resentments and latent frustrations, and he must release them. So let him march; let him make prayer pilgrimages to the city hall; let him go on freedom rides -and try to understand why he must do so. If his repressed emotions are not released in nonviolent ways, they will seek expression through violence; this is not a threat but a fact of history. So I have not said to my people: "Get rid of your discontent." Rather, I have tried to say that this normal and healthy discontent can be channeled into the creative outlet of nonviolent direct action. And now this approach is being termed extremist. But though I was initially disappointed at being categorized as an extremist, as I continued to think about the matter I gradually gained a measure of satisfaction from the label. Was not Jesus an extremist for love: "Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you." Was not Amos an extremist for justice: "Let justice roll down like waters and righteousness like an ever flowing stream." Was not Paul an extremist for the Christian gospel: "I bear in my body the marks of the Lord Jesus." Was not Martin Luther an extremist: "Here I stand; I cannot do otherwise, so help me God." And John Bunyan: "I will stay in jail to the end of my days before I make a butchery of my conscience." And Abraham Lincoln: "This nation cannot survive half slave and half free." And Thomas Jefferson: "We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal . . ." So the question is not whether we will be extremists, but what kind of extremists we will be. Will we be extremists for hate or for love? Will we be extremists for the preservation of injustice or for the extension of justice? In that dramatic scene on Calvary's hill three men were crucified. We must never forget that all three were crucified for the same crime--the crime of extremism. Two were extremists for immorality, and thus fell below their environment. The other, Jesus Christ, was an extremist for love, truth and goodness, and thereby rose above his environment. Perhaps the South, the nation and the world are in dire need of creative extremists."
William Blake could be added to the list of men who were willing to
advocate extreme measures to effect the changes which would reverse
oppression. He spoke through his poetry especially through the prophetic
voice of Los and in the following poem.
Yale Center for British Art America, A Prophecy Frontispiece
|
Songs and Ballads, (E 489)
The Grey Monk
"I die I die the Mother said
My Children die for lack of Bread
What more has the merciless Tyrant said
The Monk sat down on the Stony Bed
The blood red ran from the Grey Monks side
His hands & feet were wounded wide
His Body bent his arms & knees
Like to the roots of ancient trees
His eye was dry no tear could flow
A hollow groan first spoke his woe
He trembled & shudderd upon the Bed
At length with a feeble cry he said
When God commanded this hand to write
In the studious hours of deep midnight
He told me the writing I wrote should prove
The Bane of all that on Earth I lovd
My Brother starvd between two Walls
His Childrens Cry my Soul appalls
I mockd at the wrack & griding chain
My bent body mocks their torturing pain
Thy Father drew his sword in the North
With his thousands strong he marched forth
Thy Brother has armd himself in Steel
To avenge the wrongs thy Children feel
But vain the Sword & vain the Bow
They never can work Wars overthrow
The Hermits Prayer & the Widows tear
Alone can free the World from fear
For a Tear is an Intellectual Thing
And a Sigh is the Sword of an Angel King
And the bitter groan of the Martyrs woe
Is an Arrow from the Almighties Bow
The hand of Vengeance found the Bed
To which the Purple Tyrant fled
The iron hand crushd the Tyrants head
And became a Tyrant in his stead"
4 comments:
Thank you for this fine piece of rhetoric by King, better I think than “I have a Dream” at the Lincoln Memorial, and which matches up so well to the poem by Blake.
“For a tear is an intellectual thing” — what an extraordinary line, from the greatest orator in English verse.
As you doubtless know, there’s a debate afoot to change our National Anthem from God Save the Queen (or King) when used on other than specifically royal occasions. One of the strongest contenders is "And did those feet", to the tune by Parry. Here’s an audio piece from the BBC discussing the issue http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b06vnbcy
The overtly Christian connotations of Blake's 'Jerusalem' make it an unlikely choice for Britain's national anthem. I have a suggestion.
Here is a quintessential British song which is spiritual without being religious. It was written in a period not of war but of dramatic revolutionary social change. The message is encouraging but honest. It uses poetic language speaking of 'hour of darkness,' and 'broken hearted people' to connect with the world in need. It is characteristically British in understating both the hardships endured and the solutions available, but the determination and confidence are apparent.
'Let It Be' by John Lennon
When I find myself in times of trouble
Mother Mary comes to me
Speaking words of wisdom, let it be
And in my hour of darkness
She is standing right in front of me
Speaking words of wisdom, let it be
Let it be, let it be, let it be, let it be
Whisper words of wisdom, let it be
And when the broken hearted people
Living in the world agree
There will be an answer, let it be
For though they may be parted there is
Still a chance that they will see
There will be an answer, let it be
Let it be, let it be, let it be, let it be
Yeah, there will be an answer, let it be
Let it be, let it be, let it be, let it be
Whisper words of wisdom, let it be
Let it be, let it be, let it be, let it be
Whisper words of wisdom, let it be
And when the night is cloudy
There is still a light that shines on me
Shine on until tomorrow, let it be
I wake up to the sound of music
Mother Mary comes to me
Speaking words of wisdom, let it be
Let it be, let it be, let it be, let it be
There will be an answer, let it be
Let it be, let it be, let it be, let it be
Whisper words of wisdom, let it be
_______________
An interesting suggestion, Ellie. As an Englishman (“Jerusalem” being a poem which mentions England rather than Britain) I see it as patriotic rather than Christian in the popular imagination within these shores. If “those feet”—Joseph of Arimathea and the young Jesus—did come here, it boosts a perception of our land as blessed, without imposing any religious allegiance or obligation to exclude anyone.
Its last two verses provide a rousing call to action, without being warlike & bloody like France’s Marseillaise. It’s grand and mysterious but non-specific.
Ideally a national anthem should bring people together, with words like “we shall” or “let us”. Blake undertakes the action with “me” and “I”, which is perfect when sung to a rousing tune, and collectively amounts to “we” and “us”. And then he puts “we” in his last two lines, setting out the vague goal of building “Jerusalem in England’s green and pleasant land”. Intuitively we all know that Jerusalem is a symbol for Heaven on earth, not a place where Jews and Muslims live uneasily together at best.
Is “Let it Be” quintessentially British? Only, I suggest, to those who live far away from Britain. Here it’s an elegiac pop song by Paul McCartney, whose message is overtly passive and pacifist: “in times of trouble ... let it be.” Hardly a patriotic song to give us a sense of coming together in patriotism and common purpose.
I too thought it was by John Lennon, on the analogy of “Give Peace a Chance”, until I checked. Of course we have peaceniks here too, but the national anthem is required when our Olympic team wins a medal, more often than in times of trouble and loss.
Oops, I accepted the first attribution to Lennon without checking further.
In spite of the beauty and significance of Blake's poem, it wouldn't be easy for non-Christians to accept the Holy Lamb of God, or the Divine Countenance being the means by which England achieved perfection. But you are right that it is a stirring experience to sing of receiving the instruments through which the ideal society might be built.
Not all Americans favor the Star Spangled Banner as our anthem but I do. It refers to a specific incident when our defenses held and symbol of our independence endured. Not everyone knows the coincidences which contributed to the writing of the song. The tale is of the building of the star-shaped fort, the sewing of the flag which could be seen from a great distance, and the imprisonment of the poet on a ship where he could witness from afar the battle taking place overnight. Many find the anthem difficult to sing, but the story behind the words makes singing it a rewarding experience. I especially enjoy singing it on the beach at sunrise.
Post a Comment